Twitter Flickr Tumblr

Bauhaus Dessau Foundation Identity

hort-bauhaus-dessau-identity

Beau­ti­ful iden­tity sys­tem by Hort for the Bauhaus Dessau Foun­da­tion. I love the use of Courier and how stripped down the over­all look is. Feels very tech­ni­cal. Hort inten­tion­ally avoided the visual ele­ments that we think of when we hear Bauhaus. Hort explains:

…we decided to search for a solu­tion that would relate more to the orig­i­nal ideas of Germany’s most influ­en­tial Mod­ernist school instead of rely­ing on the visual clichés con­nected to Bauhaus — it seems almost impos­si­ble to use cir­cle, square and tri­an­gle nowa­days with­out it com­ing across as ironic or historicist.

19 Comments on "Bauhaus Dessau Foundation Identity"

  • My German’s lack­ing, but that’s a bril­liant case study, Anto­nio. Great feature.

  • Dan says

    Love the cus­tom ‘A’ of the Courier in the identity

  • mary says

    but why arial?

  • Awe­some project for an awe­some stu­dio,
    but I’d like to ask Hort a ques­tion:
    Was it really nec­es­sary to use Arial Black?

    Why do you think they used it?
    Why not Univers Black?

    Just curi­ous

    Any­way, cheers from Mex­ico Antonio

  • Chris says

    I love this. The use of Arial doesn’t seem out of place at all.

    What I like most about it is that it looks like some­thing that would have been designed by the Bauhaus for the Bauhaus rather than some­thing designed by a stu­dio ref­er­enc­ing the his­tory of the Bauhaus.

  • Inter­est­ing fea­ture. The ver­ti­cal brand­ing is a lovely sub­tle ref­er­ence to the orig­i­nal sig­nage, and that grey stock is (some­what appro­pri­ately) rem­i­nis­cent of archive stationary.

  • Ben Martinek says

    The Arial Black is ridicu­lous. There is absolutely no rea­son for them to use it instead of Hel­vetica, Univers or Akzi­denz. It’s like an unnec­es­sary smear of filth over the beau­ti­ful, min­i­mal layout.

  • mary says

    i mean, ok i under­stand their choice of try­ing to use fonts every­one has. but their new courier isn’t avail­able to everyone…

  • Dave says

    Why Arial? Why? Seri­ously… Is there a reason?

  • 80G says

    As soon as I see the hor­ri­ble slop­ing ascen­der of Arial’s lower case t, I lose all interest.

  • Mary
    April 5, 2011 at 12:53 pm
    but why arial?

    The same ques­tion came to mind…

  • Arial!?

  • Greg Formager says

    The use of Arial is bril­liant. Yes, it’s an ugly type­face, but it makes sense here on mul­ti­ple levels.

  • MichaeL says

    Funny al the bitch­ing about the / a type­face???
    I think fun­da­men­tally there’s some­thing wrong with this iden­tity. I under­stand the ratio­nal but think its very weak. Bauhaus has been on the fore­front and influ­en­tial for mod­ernism as we now it. A focus on the future, away from con­ser­vatism is its key foun­da­tion. This iden­tity could have been cre­ated in it’s hey­days? How is this pro­gres­sive and how does this rep­re­sent cul­tural exper­i­men­ta­tion? Where is today or tomor­row for that matter…?

  • Sys­tem default fonts.. doing away with con­trast­ing type hier­ar­chies alto­gether… Very much work­ing under the Bauhaus work ethos. Get used to it, this is the future; flaunt­ing ordered neu­tral­ity in a world dom­i­nated by pho­to­shop fil­ters, drop shad­ows and super­flu­ous design doo-dads.

    I like!

  • sir,

    I’m a huge fan and avid fol­lower of your blog. Just wanted to know, is this a hypo­thet­i­cal project?

  • No it’s a real project. Thanks for reading.

  • so is it like a museum or trust? And may i ask, if you can guess, why didn’t they re open bauhaus ever?

  • It’s a cen­tre of research, teach­ing and exper­i­men­tal design.